A USEFUL AUDIT
Content, navigation, search visibility, performance and publishing friction are documented before solutions are proposed.
Website redesign for established interior design studios that have outgrown their positioning, portfolio structure, technology or enquiry experience.
View relevant case studies ↓A redesign should not erase everything that already works. It should identify the useful equity in the studio’s existing identity, content and search presence, then rebuild the parts that prevent the practice from being understood at its current level.
The work begins with evidence: what visitors can find, what the team struggles to maintain, which projects deserve greater prominence and where the current experience loses clarity. Design follows that diagnosis rather than covering the same problems with a new visual layer.
A considered migration protects useful URLs, content and brand recognition while creating a markedly better structure. The launch should feel like the studio has become more itself, not like it has borrowed someone else’s website.
Content, navigation, search visibility, performance and publishing friction are documented before solutions are proposed.
The redesign gives priority to the projects, services and studio evidence most likely to support the next stage of the practice.
Existing URLs, metadata and valuable content are mapped so a visual improvement does not create avoidable search or referral losses.
The underlying project and editorial system is simplified so the team can keep the website current after launch.
A fictional architecture, interiors and objects studio shaped as a five-chapter digital story about how designed spaces make us feel.
VIEW CASE STUDY ↗001An independent editorial website concept that translates The Camellias at DLF Golf Links into a researched, cinematic and explorable digital journey.
VIEW CASE STUDY ↗We separate genuine strengths from inherited conventions and identify the structural, editorial and technical causes of current friction.
A prioritised redesign brief defines what will be retained, rewritten, consolidated, redirected or rebuilt.
The new system is designed around actual projects and services, then developed and populated before final refinements.
Redirects, metadata, analytics and important user journeys are verified at launch and reviewed during the observation period.
01The studio has changed direction, scale or audience since the current site was created.
02Publishing a new project is slow, inconsistent or dependent on a developer.
03The website receives attention but does not create suitable conversations.
It can if URLs and valuable content are changed without a migration plan. The redesign begins with an inventory of the current site, and any necessary URL changes are mapped with permanent redirects, updated internal links, metadata and post-launch monitoring.
No. Useful content should be retained and improved. Pages are consolidated or removed only when they duplicate intent, no longer represent the practice or create confusion for visitors and search engines.
Yes, when there is a sensible boundary between phases. For example, the core positioning and portfolio system may launch before a deeper editorial archive. Phasing should reduce risk and workload, not leave the site with two conflicting systems.
Yes. The scope can include content modelling, asset preparation, migration and quality assurance. The amount of editorial rewriting and image curation is established after the audit.
A redesign is justified when the current site materially misrepresents the studio, prevents useful publishing, performs poorly or repeatedly loses visitors at important decision points. Cosmetic fatigue alone is not always enough reason to rebuild.
A redesign should preserve recognition while making the next chapter unmistakable.
Book a 30-minute call ↗